Posted in Transparency International

Transparency International Report 2025

The 2025 Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI) paints a sobering picture of global governance. Transparency International measured perceived public-sector corruption in 182 countries, and the global average fell to 42/100, the lowest in more than a decade. Most countries are struggling: 122 out of 180 scored below 50, showing widespread corruption challenges. Only five countries scored above 80, compared to 12 a decade ago. Denmark leads again with 89, while Somalia and South Sudan sit at the bottom with 9 each.

Key Highlights

  • Top performers: Denmark (89), Finland (88), Singapore (84), New Zealand (81), Norway (81).
  • Major democracies slipping: United States (64), Canada (75), United Kingdom (70), France (66), Sweden (80), New Zealand (81).
  • Lowest scorers: Venezuela (10), Somalia (9), South Sudan (9).

Global Trends

  • Democracy matters: Full democracies average 71, flawed democracies 47, authoritarian regimes 32.
  • Civic space is critical: Countries with open civic space average 68, while those with closed civic space average just 30.
  • Declines since 2012: 50 countries worsened, including Venezuela, Syria, Hungary, and South Sudan, where corruption has become systemic.

Consequences

The report links corruption to weakened institutions, poor public services, and rising inequality. It notes that restrictions on civic freedoms often coincide with declining CPI scores. For example, Georgia (50), Indonesia (34), Peru (30), and Tunisia (39) have seen governments limit NGO activity and intimidate journalists, worsening corruption risks.

Recommendations

Transparency International urges governments to:

  • Protect independent justice systems.
  • Ensure transparency in political finance and lobbying.
  • Safeguard civic space and media freedom.
  • Strengthen oversight of public spending.
  • Cooperate internationally to combat illicit financial flows.

One striking line from the report captures the urgency: “At a time of climate crisis, instability and polarisation, the world needs accountable leaders and independent institutions to protect the public interest more than ever – yet, too often, they are falling short.”

Would you like me to create a regional comparison table (e.g., Americas vs. Europe vs. Africa) so you can see how different parts of the world stack up against each other?

Excerpted from AI

Posted in Prose

Ramblings and Jottings on Corruption

by

Noel Ihebuzor

I scribbled these ramblings and jottings on corruption way back in 2012 and published them on my other blog. A reading and review of these jottings now acquire an enhanced relevance given that the incoming Buhari administration was part marketed to the Nigerian electorate using the fight against corruption as a sound byte. Administrations can only combat what they understand – and understanding presupposes sound problem conceptualization and adequate causality analysis. The hope is that a reading of these ramblings and jottings will prompt such. It is also hoped that they will set the nation on a course of action to correctly and sustainably tackle corruption, a course of action that would involve a blend of preventive, punitive and corrective measures. Populist approaches (high drama, handcuffs and histrionics) to tackling corruption are very attractive and the photo and media pecks they bring are numerous but such approaches are hardly ever sustainable. Sustainable approaches involve the judicious blend of environmental control, internal controls, incentives, deterrence, sanctions, positive deviance and behaviour change. We hope that policy makers and corruption fighters will read these ramblings and jottings, reflect on them and apply the useful ones in their fight against corruption. Goodluck!

PS/ In a related reading on this blog, I discuss the need for fast but fair prosecution of corruption cases. In a number of situations, the failure of the judiciary to achieve this is a major inhibitor to the effective fight against corruption.