Posted in Uncategorized

Waves of Vanishing Futures

by Noel Ihebuzor

Trapped in the endless motion of time,

Yet still—unmoving,

As shadows drift past and we drift past shadows.

All fixed, locked in the quiet geometry of my steps.

Hindsight—an illusion, foresight—drowned in tides of effluvia,

where futures vanish, pasts re-echo, reappear and futures past multiply….

Unending, unseen.

 

Posted in Uncategorized

Abuja

By

Noel IHEBUZOR

City of the superfluous and inadequate

home of the ubiquitous chasing anonymity

as poverty resides rowdily with affluence,

and contractors seek contacts with tiring influence

vendors long past utility

the new sing old refrains with waning zeal

the old revisit overused swan songs,

as the clocks tick fast and slow, undecided

the placards of today announce the ruins of tomorrow

We all sing with different voices

different times, different topics,

craving harmony with discordant tunes.

The houses tell tales of indecent haste and taste riots…..

and in the ever enlarging rowdiness, haze and craze

the only person you can see and trust is yourself,

and even this dimly, dimly and dimmer

__________________________

Posted in Uncategorized

Bent beyond broken.

By Noel Ihebuzor

Truth is twisted, lies fall in to assorted lines, by hook and crook,  mimicking straight lines, tangled lines tangle lives, tangled lives tangle minds,  in vain we seek to untwist a tangled wreck,


the broom, overrun by yesteryear’s cobwebs has lost its power to sweep,

only witches and wild wizards, unable to find rest or sleep now hop around, crossing carpets to and fro, hopeless and hapless on its jagged ends!

 

Posted in Uncategorized

Widows’ mites

By Noel Ihebuzor

May the flour jars and jars of oil in our lives never run dry but may they be always replenished like fountains of eternal gift from God because we have given in support of the truly needy. The lady who gave two cents in the NT Reading represents someone who gives with deep faith,  confident in the munificence of God. Her gift and its real value effectively teach us the economic concepts of marginal significance and opportunity cost. Christ’s remarks on her giving teach us that a gift is not measured by its absolute value but by the real effort and sacrifice that giving involves. So even before the principles enunciated in “The Wealth of Nations”, Jesus, our Lord and Savior, was already well versed in economics. If the giving to a worthy receiver does not cause some pain, then there is no gain in it.
The gifts of the two women take on enhanced significance when we realize that the two women are widows. We must remind ourselves that these narratives are set in a social context where widows were the lowest of the low, the bottom of bottom of the social pyramid, victims of societal discrimination given the harmful widowhood practices that were so rampant at that time. It would thus appear that the Harmful Traditional Practices we notice in society today have a long history! Yet these victims of discrimination stepped out and made their marks in acts overflowing with faith and genuine care of others.
May we have the faith to give like these two women, Amen.

https://bible.usccb.org/bible/readings/111024.cfm

Posted in Uncategorized

Selective Social Activism – an initial sketch of the sociology of the Nigerian self acclaimed social activists on Twitter by Noel Ihebuzor

noelihebuzor

Follow

A first sketch of a sociology of the Naija self-acclaimed “social activist” twitter community

Reactions to recent events in Nigeria, notably the very tragic loss of lives in the crash of a Dana aircraft and the changing of the name of the former University of Lagos to Moshood Abiola University, Lagos bring again to the fore some persisting peculiarities about social media usage in Nigeria. In the former, whilst families and almost the entire nation stood in shock and mourned in a spontaneous outburst of grief and outrage, a group of individuals jumped on the sad event and sought, after a brief interlude of demonstration of solidarity with families affected by the tragedy, to twist it to advance particular agendas. In the latter, rational discussion and review were marred by a combination ethnic undertones in the reactions and comments of a number of Nigerians and again by an “events hijack” by a group of individuals anxious to score political points. The ethnic undertones were indeed disturbing and of such a strength and intensity that some persons were even willing to venture as far as to question the significance and brand value of MKO in relation to the institution that was being re-named after him. This was surprising as it came from a section of the country that had all along clamoured for some fitting recognition for MKO for his contribution to the re-emergence of democracy in Nigeria. Politics does strange things to people’s memory and their judgments! But let us leave that aside for now with the hope to return to it on some other occasion.

My interest is this write up is the behaviour of a particular group of users of social media, specifically “Twitter”. This group is of interest to me because they were in the forefront of the attempts to politically hijack the two events I had mentioned earlier in this write up. This group dominates the Naija Twitter space by the sheer volume of their tweets and see themselves as social activists. It sees itself as the social conscience of our nation and has arrogated to itself the moral high ground of socio-political rectitude and probity. I write this piece as a first sketch of the sociology of this group. My intention is to see what, at a first level of examination, the patterns of conduct of this group on Twitter as a social media can reveal for the field of sociology of groups.

The easiest definition of sociology is that it is a study of society – how society is structured, the rules, the norms, codes and convention that govern it and the power relations which sustain it. Sociology looks closely at institutions, especially at its norms, rules, laws and codes. Central to sociology is the assumption that things do not just happen and that no structure in society, no event, no human action happens by chance. By implication, events in society are linked by a deep nexus of functions, causality, intentions and end seeking behaviour. Sociology assumes that human actions are purposive but are framed in time and space by rules, norms and functions. Events and actions are socially determined, rewarded and sanctioned by rules, norms and conventions which in the end betray power relations, social functions and status.

Sociology also sees every society as being made up of smaller units or communities, which are also mini societies in themselves. Each of these communities would have its norms, rules, conventions, power structure and reward system.  In the larger society we can then find  a community of writers, a religious community, an Agbero community, a medical community, a social media community and even within this community, a twitter “social activist” community! It is this last group that I will be looking at in this article that attempts, as I have indicated earlier on, a first sketch of its sociology. This first sketch is based on observations from the tweeting habits of this Nigerian “Twitter Social Activist community”, especially the content, pattern, language and style of its “tweeple”. These observations allow one to uncover a discernable power structure, clear pecking order, a set of unwritten rules of engagement, and a package of incentives and reward structures that ensure group cohesion and sustain loyalty. These observations were made from January to June 2012, It therefore covers from the “occupy” period right up to the recent June “sting”. I will be looking at the following – purpose and intention of this group – (stated or implicit), structure of the group,  control and incentives, content of tweets, ground rules (stated or implicit), how the group deals with opposition and the spatial distribution of this group. This article is exploratory and I welcome comments and challenges.

Purpose and intention

The major ambition of this “social activist community” is to steer and dominate public opinion to the point of suffocating and drowning any dissenting voices. In the current dispensation, this ultimate end game is to unseat the PDP in 2015. Marketing this agenda and drawing supporters to it has been greatly facilitated by the seeming inability of the Jonathan administration to deal in a decisive way with critical problems of governance in this country, especially corruption, insecurity and decline in our social services provision sector. In the short and medium terms, the objectives are to magnify these failings of the GEJ administration, increase its unpopularity, undervalue and rubbish any achievements it may lay claims to. Regime change through the ballot is the ultimate goal.  The means to this end include direct insults to the presidency and the person of the president, distortion of events to inculpate the president, deliberate falsehoods, exaggerations, ridicule, biased reporting and deliberately outrageous remarks meant to inflame and confuse. Members of this group are socialized into behaviours that produce all of these in the tweets. This socialization is achieved through a subtle blend of social pressure and incentives made possible by the structure of this “activist” community.

  Structure

The structure of the community looks deceptively flat but it is not so in reality. There is an overall leader and below him/her, another level of leaders. These second level leaders are in charge of their specific “cells” and do their best to maintain a supportive and “mentoring” relationship with members with the aim of cleverly creating a dependence syndrome by these members. Below this second leadership level, and within these cells, there is the broad followership. In this broad followership, you will find an assorted array of persons – male and female, who function more or less as enforcers and hit men and women. Their job is to increase the anti-government tweet traffic and protect their members by hacking at anybody bold enough to challenge tweets from them. In many ways, this “social activist” community functions with a lot of the modus operandi and patterns of typical cults in our tertiary institutions – follow and obey the cult leader, loyalty to the cult and to its overall mission is more important than your individual likes and dislikes; your individual standing in society is actualized and enhanced the more the cult flourishes; your blind and unquestioning loyalty is critical for the cult to flourish. As with cults, so it is with this community where members willingly abandon reason and logic to follow the tweets of their leaders and defend these with passion and fury!

The overall leader of this community is not elected. Rather he/she emerges by self-selection, exploiting any surviving credibility from previous political incarnations to dazzle and befuddle members. This surviving credibility is carefully nurtured, packaged and repackaged and kept in the eyes of this “activist” community who relate with him or her with considerable adulation!  He or she shapes and determines of the social activist agenda and direction for the week. This is usually achieved through the use of  well-choreographed regular clinics on Twitter where this leader fields and answers questions and then makes broad swipes at persons and institutions. Such clinics then set the tone for the week and the abuse sound byte for that week is usually released during such clinics. The contents of the clinics are constantly shared to all members through the instrumentality of “Following”, retweets, member replies and new tweets by members – the purpose of these being to amplify the leader’s voice and reach. Let us suppose that the leader’s name on Twitter is @Yabiswacko, then the members, especially the second level leaders quickly start sending out tweets like “If you are not following @Yabiswacko now, you are missing a lot. Please retweet”.  Because of the architecture of twitter, once you send out this message @Yabiswacko automatically knows it and you suddenly come to his attention as a strong ally! Any member who retweets or replies is also noticed. This explains the rather sudden burst in tweeting and retweets that accompany the leader’s clinic sessions, as tweeple, especially the new recruits and fresh converts, all start tweeting away and struggling to be noticed.

Control and incentives

How does this community manage to control its members? This is intriguing and the leaders of this community have developed and modified the use of a management pattern described in management literature as influence without authority. The modification comes in the form of the subtle blend of thought control tactics with reward and recognition. Leadership is always feeding its members with a specific spin on issues that ends up warping their minds and creating in them a sense of hysteria. It exploits a desire to belong by young people and uses subtle and psychological pressure to get these young people in their various locations to respond along lines that the leader desires. One group-belongingness strategy consists in creating a belief among members of this group that they, the self-certified social activists are the correct, morally upright few with vision and boldness. Further recognition also comes in the form of retweets and mentions by the leaders, something which members crave. Another form of recognition is promoting the member with the greatest volubility and distinction in insolence by the leader with a tweet such as “Follow @Fineshineshinebobo444 – he is a great Nigerian”!  Members then retweet!  Or this for a group of selected members – “Please follow @hair_ead999 @liteebrane001 @hemuty_kokohead0Y0 @FyneGal789 because they are Nigerian youths with vision”. This type of recognition is anxiously sought after and lapped up by young men and women thirsty for social recognition. The final recognition, the icing on the cake is made when the leaders and his lieutenants follow the tweeter in question. This type of recognition is celebrated the same way an adolescent boy celebrates the first sign of hair growth on his face!

Content of Tweets

Most of the tweets are one liner swipes and insults. Name calling is rampant – goons, thugs, thieves occur with deadening repetitiveness and frequency. Complex situations are reduced to simple statements and blame is shared very liberally, with finger pointing always pointing to the other person. Any event that embarrasses government is celebrated and orchestrated to the point that some tweeple were triumphant at the yellow card incident in South Africa, the failed rescue mission where two hostages died, killed by the captors. A screaming tweet – something like – “British Army invades Nigerian territory” suddenly jarred the twitter space as one tweeple gave expression to the sensationalism which is also a feature of the behaviour of this group. NOI failed bid for the World Bank presidency was celebrated in style and with rejoicing. There is a restructuring in a federal ministry and the first reaction is to gloat because of a feeling that the Personal Assistant to the Minister in the affected ministry is going to lose his job! The Bashorun MKO recognition effort was roundly rubbished as the “clueless” act of a “clueless” and “shoe-less” president, the Dana crash was caused by presidential incompetence, the president tears at the sight of the crash were fake, the cassava bread is a no brainer, GEJ is trying to undo UNILAG by renaming it MAUL because he failed to get admitted there…the list is endless – a sad commentary on how far the slide in mental processing has gone in certain sections of the populace of this country. No visible ideology, no alternative vision, no grand plan are discernable in the tweets of this group. Rather what seeps through is simple intense dislike for the president.  A growing number of these tweeple are beginning to have their own blogs but apart from a minuscule of well-argued articles, content and style are one dimensional, single simple story in orientation, and usually marred by bias, deliberate deceptive spins and distortions. Whatever facts are in them are badly mangled by subjectivity and poorly concealed political motives.

Ground rules

Every community has its ground rules. The “social activist” is no exception. You can discern some of their unwritten ground rules from their tweeting behaviour.

1.      Never criticise those higher than you on the pecking order

2.      Never disagree with those higher than you in public. Use the DM facility, if you must disagree

3.      Align behind the leadership and follow them, supporting and backing up their every utterance, no matter how outrageous and out of touch with reality they may be

4.      Show unswerving loyalty to the leaders, overwhelm them with adulation and you will get your stripes and more recognition

5.      Join the twitter battle to defend the leaders even before you understand what the issue is all about.

6.      Defend group members – act with greater fury than the cavalry described in the Charge of the Light Brigade by Alfred, Lord Tennyson

7.      Give credit to the leader using the @Yabiswacko option even in a general tweet.

Such behaviour and the norms which underpin them show that this tweeter community is not about equals who share a commonly held ideology freely associating. They rather reveal an association marked by subservience and pernicious mind control. We are seeing social interaction strongly steeped in well internalize power relations and subservience to authority. Persons in this community subject themselves to the influence and control in a structure that has no directly visible formal authority To understand this, we will need to posit that this influence is exercised through an incentive structure which uses recognition in the present accompanied by the hope of social ascent/mobility in the future.

Overcoming opposition

Dealing with opposing voices involves a swarm and swamp attack strategy when the target is suddenly besieged by taunts and insults by “social activist” acting with fury and frenzy in a co-ordinated storm attack. Reason is buried. Senseless fury and noise are let loose on the Twitter space.  And the storm attack is not fortuitous – it is triggered by an innocent tweet say by @CAPO_ogbaegbe to all who follow him “check out my TL for my rants” or by another capo to his brigade – “check out @CAPO_ogbaegbe as he takes on a goon”.  Leading the attack are hackers – male and female – who act with energy of unchained sadists, unleashing an un-ending chain of verbal violence, directed not just at the victim but also to his/her family.

Geography and spatial distribution

One should never trust names on Twitter because people use fake names.  However, if names are anything to go by, a lot of these angry people are from the southwest of Nigeria. They are very liberal and non-discriminating in their attacks. To qualify for their attacks and insults, you simply have to belong to the PDP, or be suspected to have sympathies for a PDP position. The voice of the South-South and the South East is more moderate in this community. It is not so loud, and their representation is weak. But the very few who do show up appear to want to out-do themselves and their soul mates from the South West – but they are not really convincing, their hearts are not really in it and theirs could be simple posturing.  Voices from the North have two key features – they align predominantly behind one voluble and all-knowing gentleman. They are very usually very guarded in their attacks on persons from the North, even if that person belonged or still belongs to the reviled PDP. However, they become very bold in their tweets on persons from the South! We therefore are dealing with a group dominated by the South-West and the North who are using Twitter to attack and run down the president and his party but who are careful and controlled in their tweets on persons belonging to political parties that have the South-West and the North as their home bases.  In addition, tweeple from the north are also very careful in what they say about persons from the north, whether or not that person belongs to the reviled PDP. Their take on the emerging revelations from the recent “sting” operation speaks volumes.

  Conclusion

So this is the Nigeria “social activist” community. The social conduct and actions as described above are not reflective in the least of social activism as universally understood. Rather, they smirk of the antics of immature political opposition that conveniently tells itself that it is practising social activism. Or perhaps, the title is a convenient label being used by opposition party political activists to disguise their real intentions and its identities. This is not to mean that there are no genuine social activists out there but their voices are usually drowned in the howling noise of this new breed of political party mobilisers, recruitment agents and propagandists. One anxiously looks forwards to hearing more of their voices as they call attention to key social issues of governance guided by the principles of problem solving, objectivity, non-partisanship, impartiality, truth, relevance, justice and  a concern for the common man and woman struggling to make ends meet in our struggling country.

Posted in Uncategorized

Wise Choices and Sound decisions by Noel Ihebuzor – (reflecting on the daily readings for 31/08/2024)

Today’s readings touch on choices, decisions and wisdom. In the first reading, the apostle Paul does what he does best – drawing from his familiarity with greek philosophy to use opposites to contrast God’s wisdom with human wisdom. The whole exercise enables Paul to show the profound superficiality of much of what we humans see as indicators of our wisdom. Much of that pretended wisdom is indeed nothing else but vanity upon vanity, just plain shakara!
In the Gospel reading, Jesus resorts to a parable to bring out the limited rationality of much of human decisions, especially in the example of the servant who buries his talent and therefore and thereby forecloses its possibility of growth and development.
We are, most times, like this third servant in our decision making and in our choices. We arrive at decisions and choices by prioritising faulty and flawed parameters and assigning weights to these. We then reach a position based on the defective considerations that follow from our earlier prioritisation process. This position we have now taken must be the right one, must always be the right one we delude ourselves into believing. We tell ourselves that every other person’s views are inadequate, not well thought out and lacking in social depth, contextual sensitivity and intellectual rigour. We resist every effort to make us see otherwise and we resort to a broad range of strategies including doubling down, trivializing and ridiculing alternative views and voices. Hubris would already have kicked in at this time making us effectively victims and prisoners of our pride, our imperfect analysis and our unconscious biases. We become “Amarachalam ihe uwa jere je kuola nda Onyemachi nwa”.
The readings today invite us to reflect and make real wise choices and take sound and rounded decisions which are based on a full consideration of the total circumstance involved – the actors and persons in the constellation of that decision making as well as the long, medium and short term consequences of our choices, decisions and actions. They also challenge us to examine the ethical and moral implications of our choices and what Kantian categorical imperatives would suggest as the best line of action in the situation we find ourselves in.

May divine wisdom invade us, possess us, flood us, overtake and overpower us and thus equip us with the necessary wisdom and balanced emotional intelligence that we need to engage with the world and those around us.

Ka Chineke mezie ukwu, isee!

Noel Ihebuzor

(written in the departure lounge of Nnamdi Azikiwe International Airport, Abuja, whilst waiting for a rescheduled flight)

https://bible.usccb.org/bible/readings/083124.cfm

Posted in Uncategorized

The Thing around your Neck – a review

By Noel Ihebuzor

“The thing around your neck”, TTAYN for short, is a collection of 12 short stories told by a writer with an eye for relevant detail, a good understanding of the human mind, and an admirable sensitivity to the sociological context in which her characters operate. The writer, Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie, is also capable of plenty of empathy for a majority of the characters in the twelve stories in her book as they struggle to respond to the challenges that life throws at them and make meaning of their varied existence, caught up as they are in specific moments of history as persons with some forms of agency. For a few other characters, she displays a very poorly concealed contempt for their actions and the false lives they lead trying to be what they cannot be. For such characters, she deploys her rich arsenal of sarcasm and irony to ridicule their fake lives underscoring in the process her commitment to people being true to themselves and to their identities. 

The stories cover a broad range of topics and issues from the Nigerian-Biafra war, to post-civil war challenges, to life in Nigerian universities and the plague of cultism in them, to wrong practices in academia and to the lives of Nigerians livingin the USA. A few of the stories touch on the lives of married couples whilst some others touch on relationships involving persons with sexual orientations that deviate from the norm and the pains and frustrations that do accompany such. Some other stories touch on themes of violence such as the killings in the north of Nigeria – killings caused by a blend of ethnicity and religious extremism, whilst others explore a broad array of themes spanning the early encounter of Igbo society with white colonization and its agents, especially the Christian missions, agents of evangelization and colonization, to the rigors involved in applying for an American visa in Nigeria, to repressive regimes in Nigeria, to gender and race based inequities and injustices, to sibling rivalry in an environment tainted by patriarchy and contestations of such social structures and strictures, such contestations often giving rise to very bizarre consequences.

Through these short stories, Chimamanda explores a number of themes ranging from political violence and repression, sexual orientation, ethnic killings, marital infidelity, migration and its stresses, coping with loss, racial biases, unequal and unrequited love  and its pains, the physical challenges and humiliation that often accompany visa applications, the stresses of marriage in a foreign land and finally to the inadequacies in colonial historiography. She also uses her story to point out ethical and moral failures in the banking sector, where banks use young girls in their marketing divisions to bait rich randy men and potential depositors. Here we note the subtle and not too subtle critique of the abuse of financial power by rich men who exploit power asymmetries in their favor often to take advantage of young female bank workers in age-inappropriate sexual engagements. Chimamanda thus uses her short stories to criticize these and other vices in society. Specifically, she comes against the use of financial power to secure sexual favors. The same criticism of the abuse of power, masking as cultural imperialism, would again show up in her treatment of the manner in which Edward, a white man, tries to exploit his role as workshop convener to impose his views on aesthetics on a creative writers’  workshop, and even to making obtuse sexual advances to some of the female participants at the workshop, again bringing up in the process the intersection of power and gender. 

These stories are not single stories, with one story line and a predictable ending.   Most of them are richer than comprising a number of interlaced themes and reflecting in many instances a number of  intersectionalities, such as those between gender and power, between social class and choices in marriages, between traditional institutions and modern day living and many more. It is this intersectionality that makes her tales very plausible and real. It also makes her characters to come across as people of flesh and blood that the reader can relate to. The stories are so engaging that the reader finds it difficult to put down the book until one has read the last chapter. The beauty of her writing comes alive when we start examining each of the twelve short stories that make up the collection.

Cell One is a presentation of cultism in Nigeria’s tertiary education establishment. The story is built around Nnamabia, the son of a lecturer at Nsukka who progresses from small time pilfering at home to full time criminality and to violence soaked in chilling cultism. The story is told by his sister, who resents the disproportionate attention and privileges that are accorded Nnamabia by their parents. What is sad is the way and manner that Nnamabia’s mother prefers to live in denial and to protect her son even when all the facts before her are pointing to one conclusion. There is an implied criticism of male child preference by parents as this is what partially explains for Nnamabia’s mum turning her eyes away from his criminal activities. The story also broadens to include a strong critique of our policing system, the incarceration of persons in cramped unhealthy cells, the practice of the arrest of a person whose son or relation has committed an offense and the holding of that person until the actual offender shows up.

There is also a level of covert didacticism running throughout the story and it is this. Cultism is bad news for the young one who joins as well as for the families of persons who get drawn into its crippling embrace. The message that comes across is that whereas being a cult member can bring the person a sense of power and connectedness in the short term, in the long term, it brings misery and suffering, apart from its deleterious effects on one’s morals and one’s consciousness which cultism deadens.

Imitation, the next story is a story of love, deception and cheating. It examines the pains and difficulties of long-distance marriages where one of the partners lives in one continent and the other partner lives in another. The story is built around the lives of Nkem, who lives in America, and her husband Obiora who lives in Lagos. The person who gives away Obiora’s infidelity is Nkem’s friend, Ijeamaka – (is she really a friend or simply an “amebo” who derives some pleasure by telling another woman of that woman’s husband infidelity?) The reader should also note that there is a certain deliberate irony in the name of this character which could means in some contexts – It is good to travel/travel is a good thing. Nkem’s pains arise principally from the fact of her separation from her husband caused by her sojourn in the States!

Engaging with this short story brings the reader to experience all the pains of wives of absentee husbands, especially the loneliness and the jealousy of such wives stranded, as it were, in a foreign land. Nkem’s situation is made worse by the fact that she is in an unequal relationship where she relies on her husband to lift her and her family out of poverty. She is torn by jealousy and this jealousy even drives her to her trying to imagine how her rival in Lagos looks like. She even cuts her hair to make it look like Ijeamaka had described the hair style of her husband’s lover looked like. Not that Nkem is an angel as the author makes us realize that she too had had affairs with married men before Obiora came her way. The story of jealousy is told from the point of view of a sympathetic insider including even when pain and jealousy make Nkem discuss her husband’s infidelity with her house girl, Amaechi. Was this necessary, one may ask? Envy can create stress which can then drive us to do crazy things. In the end she takes the bold step of informing Obiora that she intends to relocate to Lagos with the kids to stay with him, an act that requires the recognition and exercise of her agency.

A private experience is the next tale and this story is anything but a private experience. It is the story of two women caught up in the spiral of ethno-religious violence in Kano. Such violence is not unusual in Nigeria where religious zealots hide behind the cloak of religion to unleash senseless violence on their fellow citizens. Some sentences cleverly bring out the economic and political motives behind the mayhem. As the lady tells Chika, the rioters are not going to the small shops but are rather focusing their aggression on the big shops. As the author says, religion and ethnicity are often politicized by the political class to wreak havoc on society. One of the woman caught up in this maelstrom of violence is a lactating mother now separated from her daughter Halima by this sudden eruption of mayhem and carnage. The victims of this violence therefore go beyond our two characters – they include a child deprived of her mother’s milk and Chika who is praying and hoping that her sister Nnedi is not killed in the violence The story is told in the present from a third person perspective but with constant look into the future made possible by the use of “later, she would” or “later this would happen”

Ghosts is a story of loss and coping with loss, but Chimamanda manages to weave a number of related social topics and issues into the story. These include delays in the payment of pensions to retired university staff, the Nigeria-Biafra civil war, a blistering criticism of indecent practices in Nigerian universities starting from abuse of power by university vice chancellors, the unsavoury practices of university lecturers, the scourge of fake drugs to the endemicity of bribery before one can access public services. Running in the background of all of these is the story of a professor who hallucinates and who believes that his late wife Ebere comes to him at night. One conclusion that we can safely draw from this is that the professor is yet to achieve closure on the death of his wife!

On Monday of last week is a story that explores a number of themes – child minding patterns in the USA, the challenges of identity in biracial unions, Immigration challenges and how living apart because of difficulties with obtaining visas to the USA can slowly but surely eat away at the bonds of relationships. It is a story of the troubling issue of a marriage in a drift and where partners are becoming more like strangers to one another and the tragedy in a union where affection gradually dies out. It also hints at the taboo topic of lesbianism as Kamara discovers that she is gradually being sexually attracted to Tracy.. Kamara is the main character, and the story is told from her point of view. She makes powerful statements about parenting in the USA describing it on one occasion as a “juggling of anxieties” that came about from “having too much food”!

Kamara is also capable of very powerful descriptions of people and emotions – one’s “eyes shining with watery dreams”, describing her emotions on her first encounter Tracy, the mother of Josh, the boy she is hired to look after as a “flowering of extravagant hope” and describing Neil (Josh’s father) as a “collection of anxieties”. The relationship between Kamara and Tobechi as undergraduates at Nsukka is described as “filled with an effortless ease”. This contrasts with the emptiness and the “desperate sadness” she now feels because the emotions she wanted to hold in her hands were no longer there. A sad tale indeed.

Jumping Monkey Hill is another story that explores racism and gender and a number of other themes using a writers’ retreat as the canvas on which these are painted. The story explores and challenges white supremacist views on literariness and aesthetics, abuse of power, moral decay and sexual exploitation of females in the banking sector in Nigeria and finally the differences between West Africans and their brothers/sisters from Eastern and Southern Africa in their relationship with persons from the seats of power of their former colonial masters. The story is told from the point of view of Ujunwa, a former bank worker now turned budding creative writer.

Through Ujunwa’s eyes, we witness the corruption and use of female staff of banks as baits to catch clients and secure deposits from these. Her experience with Alhaji is most distressing and the practice as described was a common feature of client sourcing in banks in Nigeria some few years ago. She decides to make this experience the core of her creative writing assignment at the writers’ workshop in jumping monkey hill and is distressed at the dismissive appraisal her effort receives from Edward, the workshop organizer. Edward comes across as someone with a strong colonial hangover as his attitude to the participants at the workshop betrays major strains of patronizing condescension. He also has poorly concealed sexual intentions towards Ujunwa and in this he cuts the figure of an exploitative sexual predator. Other themes touched upon in this powerful story are those of lesbianism and marital infidelity. The former centers on the life of the workshop participant from Senegal  who has come out to declare her lesbianism, whilst the latter, marital infidelity, affects Ujunwa’s mum who is abandoned by Ujunwa’s father for a fair complexioned lady, the yellow woman. Peer commentaries at the workshop also afford us a peep into what one could call the rudiments of guides to people attending a creative writing workshop as well as the criteria for aesthetic judgements and evaluations of works of art in prose. Is the writing full of flourishes? Does it have too much energy? Is the narrative plausible? Is the story realistic or is it an instance of agenda writing? Is the style of writing a bit recherché, that is, does it make too much effort to be literary? Jumping Monkey Hill is a great story and the setting in Cape Town makes one wonder the utility of some creative writing workshops, especially those that are nothing else but poorly disguised efforts at cultural imperialism.

The Thing Around Your Neck is another love story involving a biracial couple – Akunna and her white lover. But this love tale is also used to package some of the challenges of immigration, such as Akunna’s sponsor for her visa who tries to take sexual advantage of her, the difficulties Akunna had when she left the house of her sponsor, the challenges of  working to earn a living and the exploitation of immigrants by their employers, her efforts to resist the love advances, the prejudice that greeted their relationship when it eventually took off and her decision to travel home on news of her father’s death. Another theme introduced quite early in the story is the huge burden of over-expectation placed on persons who travel abroad by relations and friends. Such over-expectation founded on a too rosy assessment of life in the USA ends up placing huge stresses and strains on the immigrant and could even become like a choking grip on the neck of an immigrant. The story is compelling and is told in an easy-to-read manner from the point of a detached but engaged narrator looking inwards from outside. The thing around one’s neck is an Igbo expression that conveys a deep source of worry which is always there, disturbing and choking and which causes silent but persistent discomfort. As has been pointed out earlier, it could be the cross of having to work in difficult circumstances to be able to meet one’s obligations or it could be an ever-present concern that refuses to go. The collection of stories take the title from this story and the style of writing is so endearing.

The American Embassy is set against the background of one of Nigeria’s most inhuman and cruel military dictatorships. The period was a dark one for Nigeria as individual and press freedoms were trampled upon. The resistance was championed by a loose association of journalists and academics, most of whom sought refuge abroad. The escape route was usually through the Nigeria-Benin border. The security services were most efficient in carrying out acts of repression and suppression and persons who wrote articles critical of this cruel and unimaginative regime did so at the risk of arrest and possible permanent disappearance. It is against this background that this story is set. The security services have come to arrest a journalist who has written something critical of the administration. However, by the time they got home, he had “flown”. In their frustration and in keeping with their modus operandi, they start to harass his family and one of them even goes as far as attempting to sexually harass his wife. In the ensuing tension and confusion, one of the security men shoots and kills the son of the journalist. The description is so real and intense, and the visual imagery is so gripping.

The wife then applies for an American visa and this section of this story is done with so much attention to detail that all the frustrations, psychological traumas and humiliations that persons seeking an American visa in Nigeria come across so forcefully. Can the Americans claim that they are unaware of the humiliations and inhumanity that people go through in their quest for visas? Flogging and beatings of applicants by over active soldiers with obvious streaks of sadism? Can they claim that they are not aware of the difficulties in their interview processes and of some of its opacity?

The story is full of examples of Adichie’s narrative powers. Her description of the area around the American Embassy – the beggars, the petty businesses, plastic chair rentals, the instant photographers etc., bring the place alive as does her description of the blood stain on Ugonna’s shirt as palm oil splash. Adichie also jolts us a little when speaking through the main character in this tale, she suggests that what is described as courage or bravery of the journalists who spoke up the military dictatorships could be a case of exaggerated selfishness. Is this fair? Or was she trying to draw the reader and get him or her to reflect on the basis and full driver of courage when one is confronted by an oppressive regime? The main character’s application for an asylum visa to the USA Is unsuccessful due to important miscommunications between the visa interview officer and the applicant – how fair is it to request a woman who has witnessed her son shot dead  by a red eyed security man with alcohol infested breath, a woman who had had to jump out of an upstairs window to escape possible death and rape to provide proof that the assailants/assassins were agents of a repressive government? In the end, the applicant walks away from the interview.

The Shivering is a story of unrequited love set against the context of one of the most disastrous aircraft accidents in Nigeria. The story is set at a time when air travel in Nigeria was so poorly regulated that accidents were very frequent and air travelers travelled with their “hearts in their hands” each time they boarded a flight.

The setting for the story, however, is the USA allowing Adichie to bring up issues that touch on immigration as a side theme in this sad story. Three different love stories unfold as we read along. The ill-fated love between Ukamaka and Udenna is the main course but an important side course is the homosexual rapport between Chinedu and Abidemi. The third love story is the incipient love between Chinedu and Ukamaka, two souls who had been poorly treated in their previous liaisons and who were now united by the common experiences of suffering from unrequited love. Chinedu’s case is worsened by his irregular visa status. Why does Ukamaka persist in her love for Udenna when it is clear that he does not harbor any thoughts of any serious relationship with her? Why does Chinedu cling to his love for Bidemi when it is clear that he is using him and using his economic power to hold him hostage?

The theme of homosexuality is one which Adichie often comes back to and one wonders why. Another theme explored in this short is that of God, religion and religiosity. Why does God allow bad things to happen? When bad things happen, what explanations can we advance for them? Can humans understand the mind and ways of God? Is faith rational? Is faith uncritical in its manifestation? Adichie raises these questions and leaves us to ponder them in our hearts.

The Arrangers of Marriage is another sad story involving a Nigerian resident in America – Ofodile who comes home to pick a bride, Chinaza. It is a criticism of arranged marriages.  Adichie is at her best here in her deployment of biting sarcasm, dark humour and ridicule in her portrayal of Ofodile. He comes across as insensitive, uncouth and raw as she slowly allows his personality to unfurl. In a description of a sexual encounter between Ofodile and Chinaza, Ofodile jumps on his new wife allowing her very little or no time to get into the mood. He then gratifies his sexual urge without a thought for her pleasure from the encounter. Sexual engagements of this type can actually be described as rape, even when this is done in a marriage. Chimamanda can be very earthy too in her writing here. An example of such is when she describes the itchy feeling Chinaza has between her legs once Ofodile has satisfied his sexual urge and rolls off without giving a thought to helping his wife to clean up. The author is unsparing in her slow but progressive description, call it characterisation if you will but somewhere along the line, the characterisation begins to read as some slow  destruction and dismantling of Ofodile through the strategies of ridicule and portrayals of the inaccuracies in some his claims. And the examples are legion. Ofodile speaks a phony type of American English especially in the presence of whites. And the oddities in his profile and behavior are legion  – he rejects his Igbo name, he has been involved in a green card marriage and he is very shallow when it comes to showing proof of emotional intelligence. To imagine that there are Igbo doctors who are this uncouth in the USA makes one shudder.  I am even inclined to see Ofodile as a flat character and not a rounded one. His marriage to Chinaza is certainly headed for the rocks and the reader is not surprised when she walks out of her maternal home but is unable to sustain the decision to quit the marriage because of economic reasons suggesting the intersection of female dependence and the perpetration of patriarchy. Is this story an example of feminist writing? I am not sure. Clearly, Chinaza finds herself in a relationship characterized by power asymmetry between  and Ofodile. But she had her choices. Should we not hold her accountable for the decisions she takes? She is the story teller and wins our sympathies and she  engages in one long unrelenting male bashing. Is male bashing the distinguishing feature of feminist writing? I think not.

Tomorrow is Too Far is about sibling rivalry carried too far and also a critique of male child preference in Igbo society. Nonso is the brother of the main character, a girl whose name is not disclosed. She has taken a childhood fancy to her cousin Dozie. She is very envious of the attention that her brother, Nonso, receives from their grandmother, and in one moment of senseless stupidity, she manages to distract Nonso who has climbed up a tree to harvest some fruits by shouting that a dreaded snake, Echi eteka, was on the tree. Nonso, is frightened and in that moment of fright lets go of his grip, falls to the earth, cracks his skull and dies. The story also touches on mother-in-law and daughter-in-law relationship and tensions, the tensions in this case made even more complex and intense by the fact of cultural differences and distance. Things are also worsened by the fact that Nonso’s parents are separated.

The Headstrong Historian, the last story in the collection  treats a number of themes ranging from a condemnation of practice of inheritance in precolonial times, to critique of the way women are treated in traditional Igbo society,  to the early contacts between Igbo society and the Christian missions and the unhealthy rivalries between the Catholic and the Anglican missions in their struggle to win converts, to a subtle affirmation of feminism and to a challenge to colonial historiography. The last theme in this story in TTAYN is important as colonialist historiography had done its best to present its military excursions and destructive missions into the territory of the colonized as evidences of events carried out with the noble intention of pacifying the “tribes” inhabiting those areas and thus bring them under the civilizing and beneficial influence of the colonial administration. But this narrative is seriously challenged and debunked by the research work of Anikwena’s daughter, the headstrong historian. To the extent that the historian who does this debunking is a female could be said to be Adichie’s celebration of the triumph of feminism. A combined assault on colonial historiography and aspects of feminism are therefore unleashed in this short story, from the time we are told that Nwamgba threw her brother in a wrestling match to the final unfolding when Nwamgba’s grandchild, a female historian redresses the inequalities and inaccuracies in historiography that the great Chinua Achebe had alluded to in the closing chapter of Things Falls Apart. 

Equally engaging is the rich way, the narrator exposes to us the early beginning of Christianity in Eastern Nigeria. Through the eyes of the narrator, we also get to see the tensions that neophytes to the new religion go through, including challenging and even attempting to look down on and even ridicule some of the practices in their own societies which they describe as primitive, thereby showing an uncritical acceptance of the language and judgments of the evangelizers. We get also to catch glimpses of some of the excesses of these new converts, especially those who use their developing linguistic competence in English to even try to pervert the cause of justice. Finally the motivations of converts to the new religions as well as the differences in the approaches to evangelization and the use of Nigerian languages is also brought up and examined, even though the examination is not conducted at the right level. Adichie does not spare her main characters from the lash of her wit, humor and sarcasm. Thus Nwamgba though a convert to Christianity does not hesitate to go and consult the traditional deity in her moment of need, nor does Nwamgba herself spare the agent of the oracle she consults when that oracle asks for a bottle of Gin, among other gifts as a condition for the god to grant Nwamgba her request – and it is this candid portrayal of religious hybridity that adds to the beauty of this particular story. Nwamgba can also be seen as a forerunner of the Igbo feminist in her display of physical strength and her demonstration of agency in her bid to solve problems that impinge on her including the efforts she made to recover her land which the relatives of her husband impound when he passes on. Such harmful traditional practices were rife in the Igbo society where this gripping tale is set.

These twelve stories achieve their purpose with great artistic economy and impact and do not suffer any of the defects of the short story. As is well known, a major challenge with the short story as a genre is achieving adequate characterization for the personae in such stories for their utterances and actions to achieve plausibility. Most short stories therefore suffer from some form of lack of depth in their main characters. However, the characters in these twelve stories have none of those defects as they come across as fully fledged, rounded and plausible characters of the type you could come across in real life. TTAYN is thus a great book and an important contribution to our stock of short stories in Nigeria and indeed in Africa. It is even made richer by the use of linguistic devices to present the stories and the characters in them. The use of the second and third person narrative approach enriches the story as does the way, Adichie, a consummate story teller starts a story some times from the middle and then keeps shuttling between time past and present to make the story come fully alive.

TTAYN is a collection of great short stories that examine a number of real issues and challenges – love, infidelity, envy, race, corruption, coping with loss, political violence, religion, colonialism, domestic violence, harmful traditional practices, exploitation, sexual orientation and power asymmetries in relationships etc.  It is a book that I would certainly encourage anyone anxious to experience some of these themes as seen and presented by a story teller with plenty of empathy and wit to read.

Posted in Uncategorized

Carry your cross

By

Noel Ihebuzor

“If anyone wishes to come after me, he/she must deny himself/herself
and take up his/her cross daily and follow me”.

(I have deliberately squeezed in feminine gender pronouns in the excerpt – no irreverence meant – as some of you may know, I work for a very gender sensitive organization!)

Yes, if we must become true disciples of Christ, we must each carry our cross and follow Him. He carried a heavy cross for us….and won a crown of glory.So, Carry your cross, earn your crown, No pain for God, no Gain with God.

Question is – what is this cross? I could be wrong but I see the cross as having multiple manifestations and evolving as we go through the challenges that everyday living throws at us. Your cross could be a bad wife, a pub crawling husband, a spend thrift gambling husband, a reckless son, a daughter on drugs, a sick partner, a son who has done what he should not do, an aging mother, a brother on a sick bed for prolonged periods, a health condition that you are living with, an adolescent son who gets the neighbor’s daughter pregnant, an unfair boss, a physically abusive wife who beats the hell out of you, a foul mouthed and ungrateful husband, an erratic sister, an impossible and difficult mother in-law (an outlaw in your opinion, no doubt), an intrusive and noisy neighbor who believes that his latest home studio is best enjoyed at high volumes at 0500 hours, a control freak of a father who meddles in every detail of your life, and the list is endless. Your responding to these persons and the problems they throw at you with dignity, love, care, tolerance, compassion and prayerfulness difficult as this may be is the true essence of carrying one’s cross for me.

But I also think it is also important for me to stick out my naive neck and say what I think we should not confuse carrying one’s cross with. We certainly must not confuse it with self-imposed prisons we often lock ourselves up in when we are prejudiced, our self-inflicted difficulties as a result of errors that arise from our sins of pride, our unwillingness to forgive a hurt, our unwillingness to move beyond a relationship that onced boomed but that has now died, our hatred and rancours, our jealousies – deep and petty, our obsessions,…and I can continue. “I hate him with such intense passion that the mere thought of him simply spoils spoils my day”….”Oh She ruined my life the day she walked out on our relationship and I will never ever forgive her or ever trust women again” are not crosses…they are obsessions, which often atrophy to neurosis unless they are checked. Indeed we must pray to be freed from these – for they stand between us and God. They distort our vision and cloud our judgments and cripple us physically, spiritually, emotionally, socially and mentally – they are not crosses, they are obstacles in our race to salvation and to our living full and abundant lives on earth here as we run the race.

Carrying one’s cross would involve self denial, helping others, doing your duty, serving with an open heart, understanding pain, showing empathy, helping those in sorrow to come to terms with their sorrow, reaching out a helping hand, forgiving others, conveying positivity, accepting your problems but looking up to God in prayerfulness, asking for His Grace and for a spirit of understanding, for a spirit of forgiveness and tolerance, yes for the gift of tough love. we must also pray that God should also give the opportunity to be like Simon of Cyrene – so that we can also help someone carry His or Her cross. And these Simon de Cyrene gestures need not be that dramatic – They could just be gentle word, the soft touch on the shoulder, the genuine smile of compassion…But these things are not easy, we all need critical perceptual shift and fundamental attitudinal adjustments to to begin to these things beyond just mere short lived dramatics and attention grabbing theatrics. But with God all things are possible – and I pray that He grants each one of us the ability and the willingness to carry our crosses and also to help others carry theirs. Let us have a spirit of prayer (Petition suggests something legal, so I prefer prayer) and spirit of Grace. With God’s Grace, everything is possible – we approach him recognizing our weaknesses and knowing an believing that His strength is made perfect in our weakness. But we must first show that willingness to carry our crosses daily. So, biko, jo-o, Bend down, carry!.No cross, no crown. No pain, no gain!

Noel

Posted in Uncategorized

The craft of Achebe “It is not our custom to fight for our gods,” said of them. “Let us not presume to do so now. If a man kills the sacred python in the secrecy of his hut, the matter lies between him and the god. We did not see it. If we put ourselves between the god and his victim, we may receive blows intended for the offender. When a man blasphemes, what do we do? Do we go and stop his mouth? No. We put our fingers into our ears to stop us hearing. That is a wise action.” “Let us not reason like cowards,” said Okonkwo. “If a man comes into my hut and defecates on the floor, what do I do? Do I shut my eyes? No! I take a stick and break his head. That is what a man does. These people are daily pouring filth over us, and Okeke says we should pretend not to see.” Okonkwo made a sound full of disgust. This was a womanly clan, he thought. Such a thing could never happen in his fatherland, Umuofia. // ~~ Excerpts from ‘Things Fall Apart’ Chapter 18 On this day, June 17, 1958, Chinualumogu Albert Achebe from Ogidi town in Anambra state, published one of the greatest books in history, ‘Things Fall Apart’ a book many have referred to as the Igbo Bible owing to its exactitude in capturing the ways of life of the Igbo people. In a nutshell, ‘Things Fall Apart’ is 65 years today. His career began in Radio Nigeria.